If we look to a future where getting in the "credits" is important. Maybe in the future an AI will just credit other AI work. They will make it in a super small font so it's barely legible.
Some AI can program and print the official standard. "All inspired/stolen work must be publicly documented in this fashion".
Many people will sleep better at night knowing their own AI work was recognized by another's AI.
I agree, the world scenario I stated is the same as the world of recruiting and getting a job now where the worker's AI battles against the HR department AI.
I sleep best after a long days work which is intellectually challenging, not pressing Enter/Approve with Claude for the entire shift.
There's a lot of weird, seemingly LLM-generated comments hyping the project here.
I think HN should start thinking seriously about more effective strategies to combat LLM-assisted astroturfing, if they aren't already.
None of this speaks about the quality of the project itself, but the fact that someone seems to be trying to manipulate me into caring about it makes me less inclined toward wanting to see anything relating to it.
I am not sure how to recognize llm-assisted astroturfing and how to filter it. Because I commented the project that I liked it but got downvotes - maybe my sentences were weird :)
Your sentences are weird and your praise does more harm than good for the project, in the first order at least. In the second order, comment counter is probably the most valuable ad on HN, so your comments (and mine, and all the replies) contribute positively to that.
Pretty neat. I see the page considers there to be 5 different kinds of tools but the only ones I can find all make 2D textures/images. Are there others I just am failing to locate?
If it is legit English and succint to the point, I dont mind AI or not. The moment you start labelling good and bad info as Claude or not (even if could be Deepseek or OpenAI or human that adopted AI way of writing) you ended up stopping yourself growth on genuine good info. Is like seeing perfect numerical operations and claim you use calculator didnt you.
Many people will sleep better at night knowing their own AI work was recognized by another's AI.
The thought of everyone becoming LLM middleware tires me out in a way sleep doesn't help.
I sleep best after a long days work which is intellectually challenging, not pressing Enter/Approve with Claude for the entire shift.
I think HN should start thinking seriously about more effective strategies to combat LLM-assisted astroturfing, if they aren't already.
None of this speaks about the quality of the project itself, but the fact that someone seems to be trying to manipulate me into caring about it makes me less inclined toward wanting to see anything relating to it.
If you can't be bothered to write it, why should I be bothered to read it?
Edit: Also, I've never read succinct and to the point AI prose.