$44M Solar-Powered EV Production Deal Struck

(frequal.com)

18 points | by TeaVMFan 1 hour ago

7 comments

  • geremiiah 53 minutes ago
    In a world where sedans have been replaced by SUVs, I don't see how the market would react positively to this. But then again, Lime scooters are paradoxically also a thing. I guess maybe it's a matter of marketing?
    • elmomle 0 minutes ago
      There are many cities in the US where renting a scooter to travel a couple miles is as fast as (often faster than) waiting for and riding in a car, and costs perhaps a third as much.
    • richiebful1 18 minutes ago
      Electric scooters are a walking enhancer in an urban area. Now you can go 20kph in a city and easily park your vehicle. They're also super cheap to own and operate (or borrow one when needed). That's a totally different animal than a $40k subcompact trike car that requires an actual paid parking spot
    • xnx 45 minutes ago
      What's paradoxical about Lime scooters? That they are small compared to SUVs?
    • pbkompasz 34 minutes ago
      Market != USA
      • TeaVMFan 10 minutes ago
        That's an especially important point to this new deal, Launch will give them easier access to additional markets beyond the US.
  • standeven 15 minutes ago
    This is like building a gas powered car with a refinery attached to the roof.

    Batteries exist. Solar panels add weight and design constraints. Why is this a thing? What am I missing?

    • TeaVMFan 11 minutes ago
      Solar panel efficiency has increased and they have made an extremely slippery vehicle. 4kWh/day and 10 miles per kWh gives 40 miles per day of driving range, enough for many people without ever plugging in.
  • kotaKat 45 minutes ago
    Is this so Aptera can pass the buck when it flops again (“it’s Launch’s fault, we swear”)?

    This really doesn’t answer any questions. $44 million (and worthless paper stock warrants) is also immensely low for new vehicle tooling as a whole.

    (I'll point out that an article about Slate's frugality[1] still shows some massive costs involved here. They scored a $200 million assembly line component originally from GM for $12 million. Uh, if that kind of seven/eight-figure investment is required for a single component of an assembly line, how far does this $44 million go for Aptera?)

    [1] https://www.autoline.tv/automotive-insight/slate-a-mastercla...

  • TeaVMFan 1 hour ago
    On August 20, Aptera announced a $44 Million partnership with Launch Design to design and build their first solar electric vehicle.

    This finally answers questions that have hounded the company for years about their plan for scaling and fulfilling the thousands of reservations.

  • jansan 8 minutes ago
    In 1991 Audi presented the Quattro Spyder, which had a detachable solar roof. The idea was to run a fan to prevent overheating of the interior.

    And now they won't to power the entire car with energy from solar cells on the car? I have my doubts.

    • TeaVMFan 1 minute ago
      On the "charging-from-the-sun" side of the equation, they recently had an independent German test organization measure the daily charge rate, and it exceeded the 4.0kWh/day goal. The test was conducted at their Southern California headquarters during July, however, so your mileage may (literally) vary.
  • scotty79 45 minutes ago
    I'd love if the roof and the hood of my plugin hybrid could have solar panels built in. I drive it very rarely and short distance. lf it could be topped up over few days, before next grocery or restaurant trip, I'd be delighted. I know there's not much energy to be gathered but it would suffice me. Instead I have glass roof for no reason, as if there was anything interesting straight up. Car manufacturers somewhat lost the plot.
    • ianm218 42 minutes ago
      Why though? Wouldn’t it make more sense to just have solar panels at your home where the power can be routed to batteries/ home power/ sell to the grid and configured optimally?
      • aeturnum 5 minutes ago
        It would make more sense to have both, right? Sure you get them on the house first for scale reasons, but why don't you want them on the car?
      • Finnucane 2 minutes ago
        Not everyone has a garage or driveway. Where I live, I couldn't plug in at my house. I also don't need a car every day (in fact, right now we don't have one). Being able to charge on the street would reduce the need to find charging spots all the time.
      • gpm 39 minutes ago
        To reduce hassle?

        To make it work when you live in a place where you park on the street and can't run wires to the car?

        • orwin 9 minutes ago
          From someone with a boat and solar panels: cheap solar panels needs cooling, so space between the panels and the stuff they are stuck one. This reduces aerodynamics a lot, which isn't an issue with something going 8 knots max, but I have a friend with a trimaran whose solar panels reduce his max speed of 20 knot to 18 (38kmh -> 33.5), which is why he decided to remove them from his amas and have movable solar panel instead (he put them when he beach or stay at a mooring). My next boat will be a tri too, I just have to find half a million somewhere.
        • TeaVMFan 9 minutes ago
          Yes to both, plus freedom to drive/camp anywhere, even far from a guaranteed plug.
    • Panino 38 minutes ago
      > I'd love if the roof and the hood of my plugin hybrid could have solar panels built in. I drive it very rarely and short distance.

      An old neighbor of mine had a Prius with a factory-installed small solar panel, definitely 50W or less, that IIRC was connected to the 12V battery. So one of the benefits would be in counteracting draw from various always-on computers in modern vehicles.

  • amazingamazing 48 minutes ago
    So dumb. Build bike lanes and use ebikes, many of which already go 30mph+. The only hurdle is a weatherproof cover which together with an ebike would be way cheaper than this.
    • IshKebab 34 minutes ago
      I mean getting wet/hot is a pretty big disadvantage of e-bikes compared to cars in many situations. But anyway this is a crazy niche product. Don't worry it's not going to have any effect on e-bikes whatsoever.
      • jakintosh 0 minutes ago
        > getting wet/hot is a pretty big disadvantage of e-bikes compared to cars

        I use an ebike as primary transportation 365 days a year in Vermont, and you'd be surprised how infrequently you have a day that is actually miserable to be out on a bike, even in a place with very cold winters and a lot of rain. By dressing properly (gloves/scarf when it's cold, rain jacket if the weather is not cooperating), you can eliminate 95% of the annoyances. Something I've learned as a year round cyclist is that most of the rain you experience from inside a car is actually not that heavy when you're out in it. There are maybe 10 days a year where I just have to suck it up (below 0F, heavy rain), and then I usually just skip a trip, take the bus if I can, or deal with it. I get stuck biking in real rain maybe 3x a year, and tbh I think it's probably good for people to encounter occasional friction like that.

        And so taking on all of the disadvantages of depreciation, insurance, traffic, inspections, parking, gas prices, parking bans, worrying if that car alarm in the middle of the night is mine, is actually a much worse deal to me than putting up with a few uncomfortable trips per year.

      • moooo99 16 minutes ago
        In Europe, the Fiat Topolino and his siblings are an increasingly common sight (while still being rare).

        Relatively cheap, can be charged with a regular 230V socket, tops out at 45kmph. Not as compact as a bike for obvious reasons, but still a substantially smaller footprint than any modern car - and comes with proper weather protection.

        • orwin 6 minutes ago
          My mum will buy one to work (home nurse) while keeping her big car around for larger travel. Especially with gas prices, I think you will see those more and more.