Stripe said to abandon $50B pursuit of PayPal

(bloomberg.com)

93 points | by 1986 4 hours ago

12 comments

  • wkoszek 5 minutes ago
    PayPal might still be the sweetheart, but there's no innovation I feel. With eBay having CC support and being able to charge and return a charge back to the card, PayPal now is in a niche. I'm helping a founder recruit. To handle the load of candidates, we give folks applying some $ for doing a small 1hr project, and Claude told me that PayPal may still be universal way of sending a "gift amounts". I often wonder how much work would it be to bring IBAN accounts to the US. The need for Zelle baffles me, and the fact that person A can't send $ to person B via normal bank infrastructure is interesting.
    • mrdoe 2 minutes ago
      Wait what? How are you then going to send someone money?! If not through the bank? What special USA feature is this?
  • tyre 50 minutes ago
    Makes sense:

    > The takeover interest has helped it recover, with PayPal shares jumping more than 40% this quarter to give the company a market value of about $52.6 billion.

    Seems like they tried to buy a struggling company and leaks of the talks made it too expensive.

  • rekttrader 3 hours ago
    Diligence told them they’re buying a almost dead payment processor with ancient tech. Customer lists are worth something but not that much.
    • sho_hn 3 hours ago
      Curious to hear from someone who watches this space. What makes them dead?

      It's still the only consistently supported thing I encounter online.

      I'm aware things like Wero are poised to shake things up, but still have no real idea about timeline and impact.

      • fsuts 13 minutes ago
        PayPal originally was convenient as it saved you from filling in card details each time and also allowed sending payments for private transactions using only an email.

        Since then Apple Pay/Google pay/browser wallets have taken a big chunk of its fast checkout advantage

        And mobile banking apps/instant transfer have taken out chunks of the private transactions, and more so as consumer to consumer transactions often had the parties using PayPal gift mode to avoid fees but that also then had zero protection.

        The 2020’s is much more crowded than 1990’s and 2020’s decades

        Also its was its partnership with eBay that made it dominant and eBay no longer promote PayPal as preferred payment method.

      • nostrebored 2 hours ago
        Maybe we’re doing different things or in different regions, but I rarely see pay with PayPal now.
        • distances 9 minutes ago
          I see it all the time in Europe. Many German online shops have Paypal as the default payment method and may even process card payments through Paypal.

          Also, it's often the way people transfer money between each other.

        • qingcharles 1 hour ago
          I see it absolutely everywhere still. We all exist in our own bubbles.
          • mjrbrennan 1 hour ago
            Yes it's basically every website in Australia you can pay via PayPal now. I use it less and less since Apple Pay is available pretty much everywhere, but it can still be handy now and then.
        • anonzzzies 2 hours ago
          Luckily I haven't for years now. But might indeed be different regions.
      • LoganDark 2 hours ago
        The other consistently supported thing is card numbers. I generate virtual card numbers for every merchant, no need for some suspicious interloper. For non-recurring or one-off transactions -- new virtual card for each purchase.
      • OrangeDelonge 1 hour ago
        Are you in Germany by chance?
      • fsckboy 1 hour ago
        >What makes them dead? It's still the only consistently supported thing I encounter online.

        online is dead too, no app uses paypal, and plenty of online merchants take credit cards more than paypal; they even offer their own credit cards.

        paypal hasn't innovated at all in over a decade, and people are scared of the way it will hang on to your money with little recourse.

        • chirau 35 minutes ago
          "No app uses PayPal"

          You have already lost your plot with that claim. Just because you don't use it doesn't mean it is not widespread.

        • cricalix 32 minutes ago
          PayPal is, unfortunately, not dead. It's used by RMV in Germany for a start - only way to pay for a bus ticket in the app/website. No credit or debit card, straight up PayPal account.
    • cbdumas 16 minutes ago
      Can folks responding to this comment claiming that they see PayPal a lot provide some details? Country, industry, sector, something. I'm in the US and I basically never see it on e commerce checkout flows any more (and good riddance IMO).
    • inigyou 1 hour ago
      PayPal is still the default processor in so many places. That's got to be worth something. Every other time I buy something online, PayPal is the default option.
      • SXX 1 hour ago
        What country are you living in?
    • meerita 16 minutes ago
      Most of the banks around the world are still running on old tech. Not so long ago I remember one was still using Cobol.
    • enos_feedler 3 hours ago
      Elon bought a dead social network and look at him go! But seriously, I log into paypal once a month to pay my landlord. I am a MAU. That is crazy. It’s more then I can say for ABNB. Maybe they should buy Paypal. Save on those transaction fees.
      • SllX 2 hours ago
        I wish Twitter had been dead when Elon bought it, but no, Twitter was far from dead. X actually has fewer MAU as far as I can tell[1], and I wouldn’t call it dead either.

        [1]: Seriously though, I can’t find good data I trust on this so correct me if you’ve got a good source saying otherwise, or even if someone has something substantiating this better I would take that too.

      • darth_avocado 2 hours ago
        The social network is more dead than when he bought it. Wouldn’t need the an acquisition first by an ai company and then a space company to hide its worth.
    • LoganDark 2 hours ago
      I honestly wish they could've succeeded because PayPal is one of the banes of my existence. They're one of those faceless corporations that accuse everyone of money laundering in order to steal their shit.
      • anonzzzies 1 hour ago
        They held and stole quite a bit of money from my company when it was small 'for fraud'; it was a very hard time, and of course there was no fraud. It was a long time ago and I don't get angry anymore, but it was a nightmare and nothing you can do. Since then I moved to local processing, issuing, acquiring; I can thank Paypal for all of that. Hope they die a miserable death, but I guess 50B$ says at least the managers will drive their lambo's/yachts around no matter what happens unfortunately.
        • inigyou 1 hour ago
          Of course you can do something. You can sue PayPal.
          • anonzzzies 1 hour ago
            Suing over borders. Did I mention small company? What would it cost me, in 2007, to sue a US company from my country in europe? With what chance of winning?
            • inigyou 57 minutes ago
              They're actually a European company, or else they can't operate there. The European company is probably a subsidiary of an American one.
        • funlang 1 hour ago
          [flagged]
  • acd 36 minutes ago
    There is us fair competition law Sherman anti trust act laws. "is a United States antitrust law which prescribes the rule of free competition among those engaged in commerce and consequently prohibits unfair monopolies"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman_Antitrust_Act

  • ocd 2 hours ago
    I've been wondering about this since it came up in my newsreader that they wanted to acquire PayPal. Seemed like odd timing to me given PayPal has been questionable but necessary in a lot of cases for online businesses in international payments.

    In Canada, we use Interac for more ordinary payments between ourselves, and the usual credit cards through card processors like Moneris or bank provided services in physical stores. I can imagine fewer uses for PayPal as time goes on, especially with the accelerated change driven by geopolitics. Visa and Mastercard may be at risk internationally for other countries seeking to keep payment processing entirely in their own yard.

    This matter in particular made me wonder how things will go for Stripe going forward with these policy changes that may impact credit cards.

    I'd love to delete my PayPal account and never log in again, but the use case for me right now is mostly that companies (outside Canada, and outside NA in most cases) usually only accept payment with PayPal.

  • aghuang 1 hour ago
    Thought this would happen and would work out. Must have been a disagreement on more than just the price.

    Only Stripe knows.

  • ChrisArchitect 3 hours ago
    6 months ago: Stripe reportedly makes offer to acquire PayPal https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47144064

    1 month ago: Stripe and Advent have made a joint offer to acquire PayPal – sources https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48915953

  • exe34 12 minutes ago
    "pursuit" reminds me of mortal engines. But then I think the book was a comment on capitalism strip mining the earth anyway.
  • diogenescynic 55 minutes ago
    PayPal is dying and not that slowly. It's being replaced by Stripe, Adyen, Checkout.com, Apple Pay, Google Pay... etc. margins continue to decrease with no real moat to rising competition. Eventually it will just be Venmo and Braintree left and PayPal will be a company like Western Union that people used to need, but now is mostly used by scammers... They completely squandered their spin off from eBay and acquired terrible companies along the way that didn't pan out really even one time. I wouldn't pay $25B for them. You're buying a depreciating asset.
    • 93po 35 minutes ago
      Thank God because Paypal has routinely been one of the shittiest internet companies to ever exist
  • funlang 58 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • andrewmcwatters 2 hours ago
    [dead]
  • allears 2 hours ago
    Stripe is tiny compared to Paypal, and the dodgy Stripe CEO was trying to do some wildly creative financing and work the social media memes in an effort to pull this transaction off. Wall St. basically thought it was stupid and wouldn't support it. Glad he finally gave up -- he certainly got his money's worth of free publicity out of it.
    • helsinkiandrew 1 hour ago
      Have you conflated the Ryan Coen/GameStop bid for EBay with the Stripe/payPal one? Your points match that perfectly

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgp5ll3jd4o?app-referre...

      • tyre 54 minutes ago
        yeah my head kind of spun seeing pc referred to as "work[ing] social media memes"
    • jey 2 hours ago
      None of this makes sense or is supported by the facts. Stripe is reportedly valued at $159B, PayPal's market cap is currently $52.59B, and your claims about memes and Wall St are asserted without any citations or facts.
      • jmtulloss 1 hour ago
        [disclaimer: I used to work at stripe]

        I agree with you in principle but I don't think that market cap is the right metric. Market cap captures a lot of assumptions around product mix and growth rates that have been in Stripe's favor for a long time.

        The most apples-to-apples comparison is just looking at payments volume and ignoring all their other products. In that case, Stripe just recently overtook PayPal! PayPal is enormous! But Stripe has that compounding growth on its side and GP's argument has become outdated in a short amount of time.

        This is ignoring the bit about pc which I just disagree with.