if, just saying, someone had a huge fucking laser and wanted something to plink away at, and happened to look up at night, most anywhere on the planet, ran the numbers and figured the odds, and well elo's stuff does blow up regularly
There are a lot of better ways to present your point; for example:
How many batteries supplied with Elon Musk’s companies’ products have encountered an unplanned combustion event after light or no damage?
Does SpaceX use in-house or third-party batteries in their satellites?
Is their explosion rate of 2(?) per N, where N is the number of unexploded SpaceX satellites, plausibly still within the statistical ranges defined by non-SpaceX satellites given the data available to us?
Did the satellite deflect before it exploded or are the shard trajectories consistent with a zero-impact scenario?
> Due to the low altitude of the event, fragments from this anomaly will likely de-orbit within a few weeks.
[citations needed]
How many batteries supplied with Elon Musk’s companies’ products have encountered an unplanned combustion event after light or no damage?
Does SpaceX use in-house or third-party batteries in their satellites?
Is their explosion rate of 2(?) per N, where N is the number of unexploded SpaceX satellites, plausibly still within the statistical ranges defined by non-SpaceX satellites given the data available to us?
Did the satellite deflect before it exploded or are the shard trajectories consistent with a zero-impact scenario?
etc.