5 comments

  • OsrsNeedsf2P 1 hour ago
    There's a surprisingly large Windows XP community; everything from security patches to browsers[0] to third party Discord clients[1].

    [0] https://www.mypal-browser.org/ [1] https://github.com/DiscordMessenger/dm

    • dataflow 48 minutes ago
      What I don't understand is... why? I understand keeping alive software for the sake of hardware compatibility, but browsing the web and running Discord? Is it all really just to save a few hundred dollars over... 24 years?
      • robinsonb5 26 minutes ago
        Perhaps because the level of respect that Windows has for its users has dropped with each successive version?

        Not to mention bloat: I have a keyboard with a dedicated calculator button. On a machine with Core i5 something or other and SSD it takes about 2 seconds for the calculator to appear the first time I push that button. On the Core 2 Duo machine that preceded it, running XP from spinning rust, the calculator would appear instantly - certainly before I can release the button.

        But also WinXP was the OS a lot of people used during their formative years - don't underestimate the power of nostalgia.

        Also, for some people the very fact that Microsoft don't want you to would be reason enough!

        Personally if I were into preserving old Windows versions I'd be putting my effort into Win2k SP4, since it's the last version that doesn't need activating. (I did have to activate a Vista install recently - just a VM used to keep alive some legacy software whose own activation servers are but a distant memory. It's still possible, but you can't do it over the phone any more, and I couldn't find any way to do it without registering a Microsoft account.)

        • refulgentis 3 minutes ago
          “On the Core 2 Duo machine that preceded it, running XP from spinning rust, the calculator would appear instantly - certainly before I can release the button.”

          This reminds me that there’s an NBA rule that disallows any basket made after a clock stoppage with 300ms or less in the clock - i.e. if player A managed to pass to player B who then attempted a shot, it’s impossible for all that to occur before 300 ms has elapsed.

          Meaning, I’m sure you remember it fully launched, 100% certainly before the key came back up from your press, but that is impossible.

      • p1necone 19 minutes ago
        The high point is a toss up between XP and 7 for me, but imo Windows UX peaked then (although the 98 visual style is peak for nostalgia) and has either stayed the same or gotten worse ever since. Personally I just switched to using Linux full time as soon as gaming compatibility became basically the same as Windows but I totally understand why you'd want to maintain the ability to use older Windows versions.
      • acuozzo 34 minutes ago
        Familiarity, I suppose.

        I'm not a part of the Windows XP community, but I've gotten close. I love that I can make it look just like Windows 2000 and that I know where all the little knobs and dials are. I can get a Windows XP installation configured to be exactly as I want it to be very quickly and I know it won't suddenly change on me.

      • badsectoracula 20 minutes ago
        I'm pretty sure it has nothing to do with money and plenty to do with the same reasons as people who preserve Commodore 64s, Amigas and DOS and Win9x PCs.
      • unleaded 25 minutes ago
        It's fun. most people don't actually daily drive it
  • larodi 9 minutes ago
    What applications are base on this? I mean it sounds super charming and nostalgic to drop a line or two which runs on WinXP, but is this actually useful?
  • deniska 44 minutes ago
    If you ever wanted to use a modern C and C++ compiler on windows xp, 32 bit version of w64devkit[1] does target it and provides a recent gcc version.

    [1] https://github.com/skeeto/w64devkit

  • legacybuilder 2 hours ago
  • parhamn 2 hours ago
    > Added back 5ms sleep on Windows 7/8 in (*Process).Wait (reverted f0894a0)

    This was interesting!